A complete of 320 dental school members answered the questionnaire. The quantity diversified among the many dental faculties, as the college of every faculty is completely different relying upon the variety of college students in that faculty. In keeping with title the questionnaire was answered by 39 Professors, 36 Affiliate Professors, 91 Assistant Professors, 54 Lecturers and 100 Demonstrators. Determine 1 reveals us the distribution in a graphical method.
Determine 2 reveals us that eleven Dental Schools are at the moment providing the Bachelor’s of Dental Surgical procedure (BDS) diploma program in Khyber Pakhtukhwa. All of them had been included on this examine. The responses we collected weren’t equal. It was due to the explanation that school members in numerous faculties are added in line with the variety of college students every faculty is permitted to confess and train. So, the responses had been completely different, the next chart explains the outcomes obtained from completely different faculties.
In keeping with Gender, we’ve a distribution of 173 Males and 147 Females who’ve responded to the questionnaire and submitted it again. This has been proven to us graphically in Fig. 3. This represents all of the dental faculties of KPK. This reveals us that 46% of the respondents had been Females and 54% of the respondents had been Males.
In keeping with Departments we’ve a bar graph in Fig. 4 depicting completely different departments who answered our questionnaire.
The above knowledge reveals us that Anatomy Division had the bottom return of the questionnaire, comprising of solely 2 and Oral Surgical procedure Division had essentially the most stuffed questionnaires returned which stands at 45.
In keeping with the expertise, we divided it into 3 classes within the questionnaire particularly, lower than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, and greater than 10 years of expertise. The outcomes of that are as follows.
This pie chart in Fig. 5 reveals that 42% of the respondents had been having an expertise of lower than 5 years. Nonetheless, 5 to 10 years and greater than 10 years comprised of about 29% every.
Among the many school when questioned about whether or not they used a smartphone or not. 316 of the respondents stated they used a smartphone and solely 4 of the respondents stated that they didn’t use a smartphone. Therefore, they didn’t qualify to fill the remainder of the questionnaire. Pie chart in Fig. 6 is displaying us that.
The perceptions of educating school members in the direction of utilizing the smartphone as a educating instrument
Desk 1 reveals us the notion of educating school members in the direction of utilizing the smartphone as a educating instrument. As we are able to see that a lot of the school members both agreed or strongly agreed to the query that smartphones make it simpler to entry info wherever and anytime (Imply 1.46 SD 0.65) this imply interprets that a lot of the members selected the choice strongly agree or agree. That is proven within the Fig. 7 pie chart as properly.
Equally, the college response to the query that Smartphones can enhance at school participation and elsewhere collaboration between college students was optimistic with Imply 2.43 SD 1.01. Which means a lot of the school selected agree or remained unsure about this. That is proven in Fig. 8.
Desk 2 reveals us the perceptions of college members perceptions in the direction of smartphones towards the demographics. We will see that in line with title the outcomes weren’t vital (p-value 0.14). Equally, in line with the departments it was not vital (p worth 0.05). Based mostly on gender, the end result was statistically insignificant (p-value 0.28) and equally in expertise as properly the outcomes had been statistically insignificant (p-value 0.27), Nonetheless, in line with faculties the outcomes had been statistically vital (p-value 0.04) which reveals that not all faculties are equally using the potential of smartphones.